<label id="jkhyo"></label>
      1. <span id="jkhyo"><optgroup id="jkhyo"><center id="jkhyo"></center></optgroup></span>
        <span id="jkhyo"><optgroup id="jkhyo"></optgroup></span>
        <label id="jkhyo"><mark id="jkhyo"><strong id="jkhyo"></strong></mark></label>
      2. The Annual Equipment of Pipeline and Oil &Gas Storage and Transportation Event
        logo

        The 26thBeijing International Exhibition on Equipment of Pipeline and Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation

        ufi

        BEIJING, China

        March 25-27,2026

        LOCATION :Home> News> Industry News

        Nigeria demands $62 billion from oil majors for past profits

        Pubdate:2019-10-11 11:43 Source:liyanping Click:

        ABUJA (Bloomberg) - Nigeria is seeking to recover as much as $62 billion from international oil companies, using a 2018 Supreme Court ruling the state says enables it to increase its share of income from production-sharing contracts.

        The proposal comes as President Muhammadu Buhari tries to bolster revenue after a drop in the output and price of oil, Nigeria’s main export. It’s previously targeted foreign companies, fining mobile operator MTN Group Ltd. almost $1 billion for failing to disconnect undocumented SIM-card users, and suing firms including JPMorgan Chase & Co. in a corruption scandal.

        In the latest plan, the government says energy companies failed to comply with a 1993 contract-law requirement that the state receive a greater share of revenue when the oil price exceeds $20 per barrel, according to a document prepared by the attorney-general’s office and the Justice Ministry. The document, seen by Bloomberg, was verified by the ministry.

        While the government hasn’t said how it will recover the money, it has said it wants to negotiate with the companies. In its battle with MTN, the fine imposed on the company was negotiated down from an initial penalty of $5.2 billion.

        Nigerian presidency spokesman Garba Shehu didn’t answer three phone calls or respond to a text message requesting comment.

        Under the production-sharing contract law, companies including Royal Dutch Shell Plc, ExxonMobil Corp., Chevron Corp., Total SA and Eni SpA agreed to fund the exploration and production of deep-offshore oil fields on the basis that they would share profit with the government after recovering their costs.

        When the law came into effect 26 years ago, crude was selling for $9.50 per barrel. The oil companies currently take 80% of the profit from these deep-offshore fields, while the government receives 20%, according to the document. Oil traded at $58.29 a barrel on the London-based ICE Futures Europe Exchange.

        Most of Nigeria’s crude is pumped by the five oil companies, which operate joint ventures and partnerships with the state-owned Nigerian National Petroleum Corp.

        Representatives of the oil companies met Justice Minister Abubakar Malami Oct. 3 in the capital, Abuja, according to two people familiar with the discussions who asked not to be identified because the meeting wasn’t public. Malami told them that while no hostility is intended toward investors, the government will ensure all the country’s laws are respected, the people said.

        Ruling Challenged

        Oil companies including Shell have gone to the Federal High Court to challenge the government’s claim that they owe the state any money, arguing that the Supreme Court ruling doesn’t allow the government to collect arrears. They also contend that because the companies weren’t party to the 2018 case, they shouldn’t be subject to the ruling.

        “We do not agree with the legal basis for the claim that we owe outstanding revenues,” Shell’s Nigerian unit said in an emailed response to questions.

        Chevron spokesman Ray Fohr said the company doesn’t comment on matters before the court. Its units in Nigeria “comply with all applicable laws and regulations,” he said by email.

        Exxon and Total declined to comment, while Eni officials didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

        The Supreme Court ruling followed a lawsuit by states in Nigeria’s oil-producing region seeking interpretation of the nation’s production-sharing law. The states argued that they weren’t receiving their full due. The court ruled in their favor and asked the attorney general and justice minister to take steps to recover the outstanding revenue.

        The 1993 law required that its provisions be reviewed after 15 years and subsequently every five years. The attorney-general’s office insists that the provision for a higher share of revenue doesn’t require legislative action to take effect, according to the document.

        “Instead it imposes a duty on the oil companies and contracting parties, being NNPC, to by themselves review the sharing formula,” the ministry said.

        主站蜘蛛池模板: 日韩免费码中文在线观看| 亚洲日韩乱码中文无码蜜桃臀| 国产乱妇高清无乱码免费| 亚洲AV无码一区二区一二区| 日韩免费无码视频一区二区三区| 免费国产黄网站在线观看视频| 亚洲熟伦熟女新五十路熟妇| 亚洲国产精品无码AAA片| 久久精品a亚洲国产v高清不卡| 欧亚一级毛片免费看| 国产精品另类激情久久久免费| 国产免费观看a大片的网站| 中文字幕亚洲日韩无线码| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区狼人影院| 一区二区无码免费视频网站| 91亚洲自偷在线观看国产馆| 久久亚洲精品无码av| 四虎国产精品免费久久| 亚洲一区二区影视| 思思re热免费精品视频66| 亚洲精品欧洲精品| 成年人网站免费视频| 免费a在线观看播放| 国产亚洲视频在线观看| 国产成人免费AV在线播放 | 免费在线看黄的网站| 最近免费中文在线视频| 免费观看午夜在线欧差毛片| 色偷偷噜噜噜亚洲男人| 国产91久久久久久久免费| 污污免费在线观看| 亚洲宅男天堂在线观看无病毒| 一级特黄录像免费播放肥| 亚洲av无码专区在线播放| 亚洲精品理论电影在线观看| 日本免费一区尤物| 日本在线观看免费高清| 国产亚洲A∨片在线观看| 久久亚洲精品11p| 亚洲国产精品丝袜在线观看| 久久九九免费高清视频|